An Analysis of Asset Interoperability for I4.0 Middleware

Maps the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM) onto Industry 4.0 middleware, using the MASON ontology to make each level concrete with a real I4.0 lab case. Argues that most existing I4.0 middleware focuses on the technical and syntactic levels, while the pragmatic and dynamic levels – where exchange meaning depends on context and systems negotiate behaviour at runtime – are where flexible production actually lives. Foundation paper for several follow-up middleware analyses.

research
industry 4.0
middleware
interoperability
ontology
36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2021), pp. 707–710.
Authors

Sune Chung Jepsen

Torben Worm

Thomas Ingemann Mørk

Jakob Hviid

Published

March 22, 2021

Publication

Abstract

An important step towards a flexible Industry 4.0 (I4.0) production needs to be taken by enabling effective integration of assets, which requires interoperability knowledge for a supporting I4.0 middleware. The middleware facilitates communication and coordination between assets. The level of interoperability influences the software architecture of the middleware, and how assets connect and operate in an I4.0 setting.

There is a gap in knowledge of the interoperability between assets and I4.0 middleware based on previous literature and prior I4.0 lab experiences. This paper presents an analysis of multiple levels of asset interoperability for I4.0 middleware. The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM) is used as a reference model to analyse the interoperability level of assets. Prior experiences with an I4.0 case and the MASON ontology are used to facilitate understanding of the interoperability levels. The LCIM provides a frame for understanding the complexity of asset interoperability for I4.0 middleware at different interoperability levels.

Concretising the LCIM levels helps grasping the complexity of asset interoperability in the I4.0 domain. From our perspective, more attention to the pragmatic and dynamic levels are required to fulfil the I4.0 vision’s potential towards a flexible production.

Why this matters

Most I4.0 middleware work focuses on the lower interoperability levels (technical, syntactic). The pragmatic and dynamic levels – where the meaning of an exchange depends on context, and where systems can negotiate behaviour at runtime – are where flexible production actually lives. This paper makes those levels concrete using a real ontology, which is the starting point for a series of follow-up papers.

Citation

Jepsen, S. C., Worm, T., Mørk, T. I., & Hviid, J. (2021). An analysis of asset interoperability for I4.0 middleware. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ’21), pp. 707–710. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3412841.3442094